BUILDING STUDENT AGENCY THROUGH ONLINE FORMATIVE QUIZZES

BUILDING STUDENT AGENCY THROUGH ONLINE FORMATIVE QUIZZES

L. Pick, J. Cole (2021).  BUILDING STUDENT AGENCY THROUGH ONLINE FORMATIVE QUIZZES. 10.

The authors are responsible for a core, first-year module on fluids and thermodynamics for a large class of aerospace, mechanical and product design engineering students. The introduction of a new Virtual Learning Environment (VLE), Canvas, across the university in the 2019/20 academic year, has expanded the potential for active learning and student agency. This paper reports how the curriculum was designed to make use of Canvas features and demonstrates how student engagement was promoted. A key feature of the new curriculum design was a set of formative quizzes spread across the year, each available for a two-week window and with a relatively high pass mark but multiple attempts permitted. No marks were given for the quizzes, but it was necessary to pass them all to be eligible to pass the module. Formative assessments can be an effective strategy to motivate students to build agency, which aligns with section 2.4 of the CDIO syllabus. Quiz 3 was the earliest when not all students passed and two of the three students in question subsequently failed the first summative assessment; this suggests that not only do the quizzes encourage early and consistent engagement with the module, but they also offer the possibility of early identification of students at risk. Evidence of repeated attempts even after a pass mark was achieved suggested a high level of motivation in some students to do well in the quizzes. Student surveys indicated their belief that the quizzes were very helpful. Results from all the summative assessments in the module were significantly improved compared to the previous year, and student satisfaction levels as measured by end of module evaluations were excellent. The outcomes from the redesign have been valuable in informing strategies for the move to effective and engaging online delivery due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors (New): 
Louise Pick
Jonathan Cole
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Keywords: 
Online assessment
quizzes
Engagement
student agency
virtual learning environment (VLE)
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Iglesias-Pradas, S., Conde-González, M. Á., & Hernández-García, Á. (2014). Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 542–550.: 
Alam, F., Tang, H., & Tu, J. (2004). The development of an integrated experimental and computational teaching and learning tool for thermal fluid science. Computer Science 3(2), 249–252.: 
Bain, K., Moon, A., Mack, M. R., & Towns, M. H. (2014). A review of research on the teaching and learning of thermodynamics at the university level. In Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 15, 320-335: 
Holmes, N. (2015). Student perceptions of their learning and engagement in response to the use of a continuous e-assessment in an undergraduate module. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 1–14.: 
Holmes, N. (2018). Engaging with assessment: Increasing student engagement through continuous assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), 23–34.: 
Jääskelä, P., Heilala, V., Kärkkäinen, T., & Häkkinen, P. (2020). Student agency analytics: learning analytics as a tool for analysing student agency in higher education. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1–19.: 
Kesidou, S., & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics—an interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30(1), 85-106: 
McLaughlin, T., & Yan, Z. (2017). Diverse delivery methods and strong psychological benefits: A review of online formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(6), 562–574.: 
Mulop, N., Yusof, K. M., & Tasir, Z. (2012). A review on enhancing the teaching and learning of thermodynamics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.: 
Nicol, D. (2007). E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53–64.: 
Nicol, D., & MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and selfregulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.: 
Nieminen, J. H., & Tuohilampi, L. (2020). ‘Finally studying for myself’–examining student agency in summative and formative self-assessment models. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 1031–1045.: 
OECD. (2019). Student agency for 2030 conceptual learning framework. www.oecd.org/education/2030-project: 
Orr, R., & Foster, S. (2013). Increasing student success using online quizzing in introductory (majors) biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 509–514.: 
Rahman, A. (2017). A blended learning approach to teach fluid mechanics in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(3), 252–259.: 
Rozier, S., & Viennot, L. (1991). Students’ reasonings in thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education. 13(2), 159-170: 
Sokrat, H., Tamani, S., Moutaabbid, M., & Radid, M. (2014). Difficulties of students from the Faculty of Science with regard to understanding the Concepts of chemical thermodynamics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116, 368-372: 
Tatar, E., & Oktay, M. (2011). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on teaching the first law of thermodynamics. Research in Science and Technological Education. 29(3), 315-332: 
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89(October 2017), 98–110.: 
Go to top
randomness