EDUCATION AS COMPLEX SYSTEM: NEED FOR MORE FORWARD-LOOKING CDIO PROGRAM EVALUATION

EDUCATION AS COMPLEX SYSTEM: NEED FOR MORE FORWARD-LOOKING CDIO PROGRAM EVALUATION

S. CHEAH (2023).  EDUCATION AS COMPLEX SYSTEM: NEED FOR MORE FORWARD-LOOKING CDIO PROGRAM EVALUATION. 3-17.

This paper advocates for the explicit articulation of the needs for programs to engage in external and internal scanning within an educational context, to strengthen each program’s positioning in responding to changes in its operating environment in a more timely and effective manner. It noted that the 12 CDIO Core Standards, in particular Standard 1 and Standard 12, did not state explicitly the need for Program Chair to undertake such exercises. In addition, Standards 9 and 10 also did not made clear that this should be a core competency of Program Chairs. This paper suggests that Program Chairs can learn from strategic planning management in the business world, using tools such as STEEP Analysis and SWOT Analysis. STEEP is the acronym for the five drivers of change that can affect an organization and its operations, namely Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political; and SWOT stands for the acronym Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats that the organization is facing. In addition, due to the complex nature of education, with many stakeholders often with competing demands, a tool for analysis the relationship between these stakeholders is also needed. This paper firstly provides a brief introduction strategic planning in the educational context, followed by the use of STEEP Analysis and SWOT Analysis. It then shares the use of STEEP Analysis and SWOT Analysis alongside the CDIO Self-Evaluation process by way of 2 case studies for the Diploma in Chemical Engineering (DCHE): one in introduction of chemical product design (in 2007) and another on impact of Industry 4.0 on chemical engineering education (in 2018). The paper then proceeds to discuss a key learning point from the latest review of the DCHE curriculum initiated in 2020 to enhance coverage of sustainable development, which is the need to make sense of sustainability issues. This paper further posits that today’s educational system is itself a complex system and efforts towards Education for Sustainable Development needs a more systematic approach to complement the CDIO Self-Evaluation in analyzing interactions and relationships between various change drivers and key stakeholders. To this end, the paper proposes one explores the Cynefin Framework, which had been used as a tool for sense-making when analyzing complex systems in various contexts. Lastly, this paper discusses the relative merits in the CDIO Framework in formalizing the use of external and internal scanning and developing competency for Program Chair in this area.

Authors (New): 
Sin-Moh CHEAH
Pages: 
3-17
Affiliations: 
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
External Scanning
SWOT
Cynefin Framework
Sustainability
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Brink, S., Carlsson, C.J., Enelund, M., Georgsson, F., Keller, E., Lyng, Reidar, & McCartan, C. (2020). Assessing Curriculum Agility in a CDIO Engineering Education, Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, June 8-10; Gothenburg, Sweden: 
Cheah, S.M. & Y. Wong. (2022). Integrating Self-Directed Learning into Curriculum: Continual Improvement using CDIO Framework, Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Advances in Technology Education, September 20-23; Singapore: 
Cheah, S.M. (2021). Sustainable Development in Chemical Engineering Curriculum: Review and Moving Ahead, Proceedings of the 17th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chulalongkorn University & Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, June 21-23; Bangkok, Thailand: 
Cheah, S.M. (2014). CDIO as Curriculum Model for Education for Sustainable Development, Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, June 15-19; Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain: 
Cheah, S.M. (2010). Product Design and Development for Chemical Engineering: Issues and Challenges, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique de Montréal, June 15-18; Quebec, Canada: 
Cheah, S.M., Lim, L.Y. & Chao, Y.C. (2022). CDIO for Education for Sustainable Development using Common Core Curriculum, Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference, June 13-15; Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland: 
Cheah, S.M. & Yang, K. (2018). CDIO Framework and SkillsFuture: Redesign of Chemical Engineering Curriculum after 10 Years of Implementing CDIO, Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, June 28 – July 2; Kanazawa, Japan: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education – The CDIO Approach, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, USA: 
Dolence, M.G. (2004). The Curriculum-Centred Strategic Planning Model, Research Bulletin, Volume 2004, Issue 10; EDUCAUSE Centre for Applied Research: 
Dooris, M.J., Kelley, J.M. & Trainer, J.F. (2004). Strategic Planning in Higher Education, New Directions for Institutional Research, 123, pp.5-11: 
Edelbro, C., Eitzenberger, A., Edstrom, K. Jonsson, K. & Swedberg, E. (2017). Engaging Industry Stakeholders to Support Program Development, Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, June 18-22; Calgary, Canada: 
Egger, A. & Kent, M. (n.a.). Analyze Your Course in Context, accessed on October 3, 2022 from https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/intro/analyze.html : 
Elford, W. (2102).A Multi-Ontology View of Ergonomics: Applying the Cynefin Framework to Improve Theory and Practice, Work, Vol.41, pp.812-817: 
Elford, W. (2102).A Multi-Ontology View of Ergonomics: Applying the Cynefin Framework to Improve Theory and Practice, Work, Vol.41, pp.812-817: 
Ford, G., & Miers, R. (2008). Environmental Scanning for Strategic Planning at Higher Educational Institutions: A Literature Review for Engineering and Technology Faculty, ASEE Southeastern Section Annual Conference & Meeting, April 6-8; University of Memphis, Memphis, TN: 
Ghaffarzadegan, N., Larson, R. & Hawley, J. (2017). Education as a Complex System, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(3), pp.211-215: 
Gilbert, J. (2015). Leading in Collaborative, Complex Education System, accessed on October 3, 2022 from https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/10449/Education%20Council%20August%202015.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y: 
Goldman, C. A., & Salem, H. (2015). Getting the Most Out of University Strategic Planning: Essential Guidance for Success and Obstacles to Avoid, Rand Corporation: 
Gunnarsson, S., Fahlgren, A. & Fagrell, P. (2022). Enhancing Interaction with External Stakeholder in Program Management, Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference, June 13-15; Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland: 
Hadgraft, R.G. & Kolmos, A. (2020). Emerging Learning Environments in Engineering Education, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25;1, pp.3-16: 
Hatch, T.F. & Pearson, T.G. (1998). Using Environmental Scans in Educational Needs Assessment, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, Vol.18, Issue 3, pp.179-184: 
Helmrich, A.M. & Chester, M.V. (2019). Reconciling Complexity and Deep Uncertainty in Infrastructure Design for Climate Adaptation, Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 7:2, pp.83-99: 
Ilick, N. (n.a.). Cynefin: A Framework for Navigating an Increasingly Complex Education System, accessed on September 27, 2022 from https://fireandflint.com/s/Cynefin-A-framework-for-navigating-an-increasingly-complex-Education-System.pdf: 
Kans, M. (2016). What Should We Teach? A Study of Stakeholders’ Perceptions on Curriculum Content, Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, June 12-16; Turku, Finland: 
Kuptasthien, N. Lee, L. & Lee, C.H. (2020). Advancing CDIO Curriculum Model for Thai Engineering and Non-Engineering Programmes, Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, June 8-10; Gothenburg, Sweden: 
Kurtz, C. & Snowden, D. (2003) The New Dynamics of Strategy: Sense-making in a Complex and Complicated World, IBM Systems Journal, Vol.42(3), pp.462-483: 
Lapin, J.D. (2004). Using External Environmental Scanning and Forecasting to Improve Strategic Planning, Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.105-113: 
Lerner, A.L. (1999). A Strategic Planning Primer for Higher Education, accessed on September 30, 2022 from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.498.7012&rep=rep1&type=pdf: 
10.1.1.498.7012
Malmqvist, J., Lundqvist, U., Rosén, A., Edström, K., Gupta, R., Leong, H., Cheah, S.M. Bennedsen, J., Hugo, R., Kamp, A., Leifler, O., Gunnarsson, S., Roslöf, J. & Spooner, D. (2022). The CDIO Syllabus 3.0: An Updated Statement of Goals, Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference, University of Reykjavik, June 13-15; Reykjavik, Iceland: 
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K. & Rosén, A. (2020). CDIO Standards 3.0 - Updates to the Core CDIO Standards, Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, June 8-10; Gothenburg, Sweden: 
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Hugo, R. & Campbell, D. (2020). Optional CDIO Standards: Sustainable Development, Simulation-based Mathematics, Engineering Entrepreneurship, Internationalisation & Mobility, Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, June 8-10; Gothenburg, Sweden: 
Morrison, J.L. (1993). Environmental Scanning in Educational Planning: Establishing a Strategic Trend Information System, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 12-16; Atlanta, GA.: 
Hasan, H.M. & Kazlauskas, A. (2009). Making Sense of IS with the Cynefin Framework, Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, May16-17; Hyderabad, India: 
Pashiardis, P. (1996). Environmental Scanning in Educational Organizations: Uses, Approaches, Sources and Methodologies", International Journal of Educational Management, Vol.10, No.3, pp.5-9: 
Poole, M.L. (1991). Environmental Scanning is Vital to Strategic Planning, Educational Leadership, pp.40-41: 
Rittel, H.W.J. & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Sciences, Vol.4; pp.155-169: 
Sardar, Z. (2010). Welcome to Postnormal Times, Futures, Vol.42, pp.435-444: 
Snowden, D. J. & Boone, M. E. (2007). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making, Harvard Business Review, November Issue, pp.69-76: 
Wigboldus, S., Brouwers, J. & Snel, H. (2019). How a Strategic Scoping Canvas Can Facilitate Collaboration between Partners in Sustainability Transitions, Sustainability, Vol.12(1), pp.1-10: 
Zeyer, A., Álvaro, N., Arnold, J., Benninghaus, J. C., Hasslöf, H., Kremer, K., & Keselman, A. (2017). Addressing Complexity in Science | Environment | Health Pedagogy, in McLoughlin, E., Finlayson, O.E., Erduran, S., Childs, P.E. (eds), Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education: Contributions from Science Education Research, Vol.6, Springer, Cham: 
Go to top